Jump to content
awwexl

Welke GPS ontvanger is het meest geschikt voor mij?

Recommended Posts

Wat is duur? De explorist 100 heeft deze chipset en kost minder dan 100 euro

 

Zit er in een Explorist een SirfIII chip?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nou het is de Garmin Geko 101 geworden. Welliswaar tweedehands maar om te beginnen een goede keus lijkt mij!

:) jammer dat het toch geen magellan geworden is! ;) Maar van Harte en suc6 met het cachen :thumbup:

 

Wie weet in de toekomst wel. Ik ga de eerste stappen in de wereld van GPS en Geocaching hiermee zetten. En dan zien we later wel welke features ik mis en of ik overstap op een ander merk enzo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wat is duur? De explorist 100 heeft deze chipset en kost minder dan 100 euro

 

Zit er in een Explorist een SirfIII chip?

 

 

Dacht het ergens gelezen te hebben maar kan de bron niet meer terugvinden. Kan dus een vergissing zijn ??????????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wat is duur? De explorist 100 heeft deze chipset en kost minder dan 100 euro

 

Zit er in een Explorist een SirfIII chip?

 

The Baldur chipset is currently used in the Magellan® eXplorist™ line of recreational GPS handhelds and is suitable for many applications where small size and affordability are critical. Manufactured with 0.18 micron technology, it uses 14-channel GPS correlation and is WAAS/EGNOS enabled for superior position accuracy. The Baldur features direct access to off-chip memory and flash through an External Bus Interface (EBI).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Baldur chipset is currently used in the Magellan® eXplorist™ line of recreational GPS handhelds and is suitable for many applications where small size and affordability are critical. Manufactured with 0.18 micron technology, it uses 14-channel GPS correlation and is WAAS/EGNOS enabled for superior position accuracy. The Baldur features direct access to off-chip memory and flash through an External Bus Interface (EBI).

 

OK, duidelijk! Ik kwam hier nog wat technische info tegen:

 

http://products.thalesnavigation.com/en/so...?image=lchipset

 

De Elcano chipset is hierbij de opvolger van de Baldur chip.

 

Ik ken de gegevens van de SirfIII niet, maar misschien dat iemand een vergelijk kan maken? De Prof misschien, die is wat meer thuis in die cijfertjes ;)

Edited by Team Firefox

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gevonden over de Baldur chipset die in de eXplorist serie zit:

 

"Atmel has expanded its GPS device offerings with the industry's first 14-channel, GPS baseband IC to carry a low $5 price tag and three-metre accuracy. The chip was developed jointly with Thales Navigation for the Magellan eXplorist handheld GPS units. Thales licensed the GPS IP to Atmel in December 2004.

 

The Baldur GPS baseband IC achieves horizontal resolution of as little as one metre, corrected, and three metres, autonomous. Vertical resolution is five metres (corrected) and velocity is measured to within 0,1 m/s. The chip's superior acquisition (-137 dBm) and tracking (-150 dBm) sensitivities are possible because Baldur can receive and process signals from as many as 12 different tracking satellites at the same time. Additionally, it has two Satellite-Based Augmentation System (SBAS) channels for Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) or Multifunctional Transport Satellite Augmentation System (MSAS). The maximum position update rate is once per second.

 

Developed specifically for portable use, the chip uses only 70 mW (continuous use at 16 MHz), and 18 mW in power-saving mode. Time-to-first-fix takes less than 90 seconds from cold start, 30 seconds from warm start and only 15 seconds from a hot start. Once fixed, signal re-acquisition is under a second.

 

The Baldur ATR0640 comes in a 12 x 12 mm LFBGA package"

 

Wellicht kan iemand hiermee de vergelijking maken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gevonden over de Baldur chipset die in de eXplorist serie zit:

 

"Atmel has expanded its GPS device offerings with the industry's first 14-channel, GPS baseband IC to carry a low $5 price tag and three-metre accuracy. The chip was developed jointly with Thales Navigation for the Magellan eXplorist handheld GPS units. Thales licensed the GPS IP to Atmel in December 2004.

 

The Baldur GPS baseband IC achieves horizontal resolution of as little as one metre, corrected, and three metres, autonomous. Vertical resolution is five metres (corrected) and velocity is measured to within 0,1 m/s. The chip's superior acquisition (-137 dBm) and tracking (-150 dBm) sensitivities are possible because Baldur can receive and process signals from as many as 12 different tracking satellites at the same time. Additionally, it has two Satellite-Based Augmentation System (SBAS) channels for Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) or Multifunctional Transport Satellite Augmentation System (MSAS). The maximum position update rate is once per second.

 

Developed specifically for portable use, the chip uses only 70 mW (continuous use at 16 MHz), and 18 mW in power-saving mode. Time-to-first-fix takes less than 90 seconds from cold start, 30 seconds from warm start and only 15 seconds from a hot start. Once fixed, signal re-acquisition is under a second.

 

The Baldur ATR0640 comes in a 12 x 12 mm LFBGA package"

 

Wellicht kan iemand hiermee de vergelijking maken.

 

 

Kijk aan niet slecht dus in z'n prijs segment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

De vraag wat nu de beste is mag of garmin?

Ik heb even beide in mijn bezit, garmin gps V en explorist 500. Beide zijn meestal even naukeurig als ik ze samen gebruik, mag iets langer onder het bladerdek maar geeft het evemin op. Straten kaarten zijn beide goed vind ik maar het grote voordeel van garmi, de topo kaarten ( belgie) zijn op te laden en dat kan je niet met de mag en dat vind ik een zeer groot nadeel. Garmin heeft dan weer meer mogelijkheden en functies. het scherm is wel mooi maar de nieuwe garmins hebben dat ook, maar moest ik kiezen tussen beide dan kies ik voor de garmin reeks!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...